Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site abnji.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!houxm!whuxlm!spuxll!abnji!nyssa
From: nyssa@abnji.UUCP (nyssa of traken)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Re: Perhaps my question isn't so simple
Message-ID: <199@abnji.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-Jan-85 09:56:22 EST
Article-I.D.: abnji.199
Posted: Tue Jan 22 09:56:22 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 23-Jan-85 07:38:43 EST
References: <3264@alice.UUCP> <662@bunker.UUCP> <235@psivax.UUCP>, <144@spp1.UUCP>
Organization: ATTIS, NJ
Lines: 15

Mike Johnston writes:

>A "human-being", according to one definition, is a member of the species,
>homo sapiens, identified by a unique number of chromosomal pairs in its
>genetic makeup. I would say that an organism acquires humanity when it
>possesses this genetic makeup.

Actually, this definition could get one into alot of trouble.  A mongoloid
child does not have the same number of chromosomes as a normal child, and
there are many similar genetic defects.  Are they human?  If so, do the
people opposing abortion on demand require that a mother carry that life
form full term, even though it would be a burden on all concerned?  If
not, do those people supporting abortion on demand deny them civil rights?

JCA