Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm
From: kjm@ut-ngp.UUCP (Ken Montgomery)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Response to Jeff Sonntag on compromise.
Message-ID: <1217@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 19-Jan-85 00:53:57 EST
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.1217
Posted: Sat Jan 19 00:53:57 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 23-Jan-85 08:38:29 EST
References: <530@mhuxt.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: U.Texas Computation Center, Austin, Texas
Lines: 18

[]
>    Well, how about it?  Are there any anti-abortionists who would be satisfied
>with a 6 or 5 or 4 month limit?  Are there any pro-choicers who would be
>satisfied with such a compromise?

>Jeff Sonntag

I, personally, will back down to the Roe vs. Wade decision if (and
*only* if) the various members of the pro-life faction(s) will too,
and for exactly as long as they honor the compromise.

--
The above viewpoints are mine.  They are unrelated to
those of anyone else, including my cats and my employer.

Ken Montgomery  "Shredder-of-hapless-smurfs"
...!{ihnp4,allegra,seismo!ut-sally}!ut-ngp!kjm  [Usenet, when working]
kjm@ut-ngp.ARPA  [for Arpanauts only]