Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uiucdcsb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsb!andrews
From: andrews@uiucdcsb.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Perhaps my question isn't so simple
Message-ID: <28000028@uiucdcsb.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 26-Jan-85 16:32:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.28000028
Posted: Sat Jan 26 16:32:00 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 28-Jan-85 04:46:05 EST
References: <3264@alice.UUCP>
Lines: 13
Nf-ID: #R:alice:-326400:uiucdcsb:28000028:000:674
Nf-From: uiucdcsb!andrews    Jan 26 15:32:00 1985

That assumes that there are no absolutes.  And if there are not than anything
that is currently permitted by society is not wrong, by those same standards.
Would you then say that slavery was only wrong for those who were opposed to it?
How would you like this statement:  "I am personally against slavery, and I will
not own any slave, but I would nt dream of denying others the right to own
slaves, if that is what they wish to do."?

Also, in regard to a previous response, what about those babies who are born
alive during an attempted abortion?  Are then now "human", to be saved at all
costs, or are they still a "parsisite"(as you imply), to be killed off?

				Brad