Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 Apollo 1/28/85; site apollo.uucp Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!wanginst!apollo!tweed From: tweed@apollo.uucp () Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: CD Reflections - 44.1k? Message-ID: <24747339.298c@apollo.uucp> Date: Tue, 29-Jan-85 11:11:17 EST Article-I.D.: apollo.24747339.298c Posted: Tue Jan 29 11:11:17 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 31-Jan-85 01:21:41 EST References: <15100001@hpfcmp.UUCP> <3411@mit-eddie.UUCP> <1420@hplabs.UUCP> <755@clyde.UUCP> <258@petrus.UUCP> Organization: Apollo Computer, Chelmsford, Mass. Lines: 47 ced at intervals of the sampling frequency above the baseband carrier (0 Hz). Any aliasing you hear in a digital reproduction occured in the manufacturer's lab, not in the CD player -- and oversampling can't help it at all. Oversampling *will* help in the following situation: Suppose there is a (sine-wave) signal at 20000 Hz. (Bells and other metallic instruments can produce strong signals in this range.) In the reconstructed waveform, there will also be a signal at 44100 - 20000 = 24100 Hz, which is not harmonically related to the original signal (the ear is much less sensitive to harmonic distortion than to other forms). If your system can reproduce this signal, and you are capable of hearing it, you will find it objectionable. Furthermore, if your system is subject to intermodulation distortion (and most power amplifiers' distortion figures go way up in this frequency range), a signal will be produced at 24100 - 20000 = 4100 Hz, which is *certainly* hearable, and again, not harmonically related. As someone mentioned, oversampling can help suppress that 24100 Hz image by as much as 50 db (before filtering), which will make it much less likely to show up the flaws in the rest of your reproduction system. -- Dave Tweed ...!apollo!tweed