Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site bunker.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!decvax!ittvax!bunker!gmm
From: gmm@bunker.UUCP (Gregory M. Mandas)
Newsgroups: net.aviation
Subject: Re: Re: Unwilling wives....flying that is!
Message-ID: <683@bunker.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-Jan-85 10:27:15 EST
Article-I.D.: bunker.683
Posted: Tue Jan 22 10:27:15 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 25-Jan-85 07:35:13 EST
References: <houxn.592> <277@rhino.UUCP>
Organization: Bunker Ramo, Trumbull Ct
Lines: 26

>             The air was pretty smooth, and all went well.  Until
> returning to Palo Alto, that is -- it was just after sunset, and
> they decided to report 2 3/4 miles visibility.  Arrgh!  No SVFR
> after sunset unless IFR rated, current, and equipped!  So, we
> took it to San Jose (clear and 7), and I picked up the plane the
> next morning.
> 
> Would you believe she's interested in flying again?  Even with
> all that junk in the first flight?
> -- 
> Alan M. Marcum		Fortune Systems, Redwood City, California
> ...!{ihnp4, ucbvax!amd, hpda, sri-unix, harpo}!fortune!rhino!marcum

Alan,

I think if you posted this to net.singles there would be a mad rush
on FBOs and the $2990-get-your-ticket plan all over the US. 

"Well the valley is foged in and we can not land. But, fear not, I just
happen to know of this little field in the mountains where we can stay
until the weather clears."


Greg Mandas
ittvax!bunker!gmm