Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site terak.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!noao!terak!doug
From: doug@terak.UUCP (Doug Pardee)
Newsgroups: net.aviation
Subject: Fly/Drive - an apology (!?!)
Message-ID: <279@terak.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-Jan-85 15:37:59 EST
Article-I.D.: terak.279
Posted: Tue Jan 22 15:37:59 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 25-Jan-85 09:48:20 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: Terak Corporation, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Lines: 21

[---- OK, listen up, I'm only gonna say this once ----]

It appears that I owe the net members an apology.  None of the
many postings (and bits of mail) regarding the fly-vs-drive issue
actually addressed the topic that I thought that I was discussing.
To a person, the responses indicate that the writer thought that I
was claiming that it isn't reasonable to fly a light plane on
any real kind of cross-country trip.

Obviously I did a ghastly poor job of outlining my original position,
since NOBODY understood what I said.  (The alternative possibility,
that I'm OK and the rest of you net people can't read plain English,
is more appealing to ME but doesn't seem very likely  :-)

So I hereby apologize for having gotten everyone worked up over
a non-issue.

I'll attempt to restate the original issue in another, longer posting.
If anyone is left who cares.
-- 
Doug Pardee -- Terak Corp. -- !{hao,ihnp4,decvax}!noao!terak!doug