Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: notesfiles
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpfcmt!ron
From: ron@hpfcmt.UUCP (ron)
Newsgroups: net.aviation
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <10400014@hpfcmt.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 13-Jan-85 16:43:00 EST
Article-I.D.: hpfcmt.10400014
Posted: Sun Jan 13 16:43:00 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 1-Feb-85 23:36:56 EST
References: <-19500@petfe.UUCP>
Lines: 16
Nf-ID: #R:petfe:-19500:hpfcmt:10400014:37777777600:604
Nf-From: hpfcmt!ron    Jan 22 13:43:00 1985

Re: Scanner legal for use on airlines

The FARs have some very specific guidance regarding devices to be 
restricted in use on aircraft operating under IFR. I don't have the
particular section at hand but I think it was under the air taxi or
heavy aircraft sections. The responsibility was laid on the PIC to 
not permit operation of < list > items. As I recall the only things
that WERE allowed were pacemakers. 
Naturally enforcement of the FAR is up to the crewmembers.

Ron Miller  CFI(G)

"IFR in gliders ?? Forget it. Turn up the Bach !"
Hewlett-Packard Co
Ft. Collins, Colo
(hplabs!hpfcla!ron-m)