Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hplabs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!dciem!nrcaero!pesnta!amd!hplabs!rodrique
From: rodrique@hplabs.UUCP (Mike Rodriquez)
Newsgroups: net.books,net.women
Subject: Re: Kiddie Porn (Re: R. Draves)
Message-ID: <1498@hplabs.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 24-Jan-85 21:11:38 EST
Article-I.D.: hplabs.1498
Posted: Thu Jan 24 21:11:38 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 26-Jan-85 07:17:21 EST
References: <4608@cbscc.UUCP>
Organization: Hewlett Packard Labs, Palo Alto CA
Lines: 14

> If the production of adult porn is as protected as that of non-
> pornographic material, why does the situation change when kids
> (with parental consent) are used?  Given that kiddie porn exists
> it would seem that adults have as much right to buy it and look
> at it as adult porn, if we accept the argument that porn may
> not be restricted.
> -- 
> 
> Paul Dubuc	cbscc!pmd

The same thing that stops kids(with parental consent) from
working in violation of the child labor laws.
Like it or not, kiddie is the operative word, not porn.
Mike Rodriquez