Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcrdcf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!barryg
From: barryg@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Barry Gold)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.flame
Subject: Re: MS/Miss/Mrs. => M
Message-ID: <1705@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-Jan-85 21:29:18 EST
Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.1705
Posted: Tue Jan 22 21:29:18 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 25-Jan-85 06:40:50 EST
References: <1680@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <2262@randvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: barryg@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Barry Gold)
Distribution: net
Organization: System Development Corp. R+D, Santa Monica
Lines: 16
Xref: watmath net.women:4227 net.flame:8003
Summary: 


M sounds okay as an all-purpose honorific provided we could get over the
objections of those who speak French.  (There it's an abbreviation for
Monsieur = Mr.)

However, I'd suggest we pronounce it "ummm."

As for Sunny's objection to any sort of honorific, there are times I want
to be formal (which means using an honorific plus last name), other times
I want to be social (and use the first name).  And then of course there've
been times when I've omitted the obligatory (and vaguely hypocritical)
"Dear" and started out the letter with the person's full name alone.
(So far I've never started a letter as "Undear [name]," but then I'm
relatively mild-tempered.

--Lee Gold