Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
From: chabot@amber.DEC (l s chabot)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: net.men.only
Message-ID: <296@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 23-Jan-85 09:30:09 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.296
Posted: Wed Jan 23 09:30:09 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 25-Jan-85 21:10:34 EST
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 15

Why should the fans of net.men.only be treated any differently than those who
read net.women.only?  I mean, in the matter of gender-exclusivity of the 
participants.  Are we determine from the posters, that anyone who posts to
net.women.only are women? (ho, ho, ho: some people are going to be mighty 
surprised)

You can state restrictions all you want, but don't expect them to be listened
to.  What?!  You think that maybe women are inherently more polite or timid
than men, and will refrain from "nosing in" -- ER -- I mean offering their
insights into the discussion?! Ha.  HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

All rude flames received will be posted publicly to net.flame,
L S Chabot
UUCP:	...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
ARPA:	...chabot%amber.DEC@decwrl.ARPA