Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihu1m.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!ihu1m!bermes
From: bermes@ihu1m.UUCP (Terry Bermes)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Re: grammar flames
Message-ID: <260@ihu1m.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 28-Jan-85 17:03:23 EST
Article-I.D.: ihu1m.260
Posted: Mon Jan 28 17:03:23 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 30-Jan-85 04:17:58 EST
References: <2974@allegra.UUCP> <1912@sun.uucp> <297@desint.UUCP> <284@ccice6.UUCP> <287@enmasse.UUCP> <230@ihu1m.UUCP> <310@enmasse.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 15


>> Especially when this label (idiot) comes from someone with the spelling and 
>> punctuation skills of [name withheld to protect the innocent] (Mike Schloss)

					>Mark Roddy

    How is it that the person who felt it necessary to call someone he disagreed
 with an idiot is the innocent one in the series of postings referred to?
One of the biggest problems on the Net is name calling. The above posting
was generated when one person felt it necessary to resort to name calling.
I felt that I was doing my part to combat this problem and get people
to discuss the topic in question and not resort to personal attacks.
Now this person is regarded as the innocent one. Innocent? Hardly.

                                         Terry Bermes