Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watdaisy.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!water!watdaisy!ndiamond
From: ndiamond@watdaisy.UUCP (Norman Diamond)
Newsgroups: net.bugs,net.flame,net.puzzle
Subject: Re: Computer bugs in the year 2000
Message-ID: <6922@watdaisy.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 4-Feb-85 14:02:17 EST
Article-I.D.: watdaisy.6922
Posted: Mon Feb  4 14:02:17 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 5-Feb-85 04:41:50 EST
References: <246@cheviot.UUCP> <974@utastro.UUCP>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 14
Xref: watmath net.bugs:544 net.flame:8203 net.puzzle:545

> The year 2000 *is* a leap year, despite what many algorithms tell you.
> The year 2400 is *not* a leap year.

So, the guy made a mistake.  Why aren't astronomers permitted to make as
many mistakes as programmers?  I even make mistakes occasionally (though
not that one).

-- Norman Diamond

UUCP:  {decvax|utzoo|ihnp4|allegra|clyde}!watmath!watdaisy!ndiamond
CSNET: ndiamond%watdaisy@waterloo.csnet
ARPA:  ndiamond%watdaisy%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa

"Opinions are those of the keyboard, and do not reflect on me or higher-ups."