Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC840302); site boring.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!mcvax!boring!guido
From: guido@boring.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Standard for union initialization?
Message-ID: <6295@boring.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 24-Jan-85 09:28:42 EST
Article-I.D.: boring.6295
Posted: Thu Jan 24 09:28:42 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 28-Jan-85 07:09:19 EST
References: <7647@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Reply-To: guido@boring.UUCP (Guido van Rossum)
Organization: "Stamp Out BASIC" Committee, CWI, Amsterdam
Lines: 10
Summary: 
Apparently-To: rnews@mcvax.LOCAL

In article <7647@brl-tgr.ARPA> MLY.G.SHADES%MIT-OZ@MIT-MC.ARPA writes:
>p.s. and what about commented in/out variables?

Uh, your p.s. applies equally well to struct initializations.  Are you
proposing another standard for that, too?  You're kidding!

I wholeheartedly second Dick's proposal.  Long live C!

	Guido van Rossum, "Stamp Out BASIC" Committee, CWI, Amsterdam
	guido@mcvax.UUCP