Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!MLY.G.SHADES%MIT-OZ@MIT-MC.ARPA
From: geoffrey dov cooper <MLY.G.SHADES%MIT-OZ@MIT-MC.ARPA>
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re:  break label stuff
Message-ID: <7867@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 30-Jan-85 21:35:23 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.7867
Posted: Wed Jan 30 21:35:23 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 3-Feb-85 02:23:10 EST
Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 14
Xref: seismo net.lang.c:4202


	if we really are (which i doubt) going to go with
break/continue <identifier> then perhaps we should provide some
isolation so that it is distinguishable from a goto label. maybe

<identifier>:: <control structure>
			break <identifier>;

the double colon would show that this is a control structure label and
not a goto label thus eliminating some of my objections to the
structure.

                          shades@mit-oz.arpa
-------