Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekchips.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcrl!tekchips!abdali From: abdali@tekchips.UUCP (Kamal Abdali) Newsgroups: net.math Subject: Re: Beyond Exponentiation Message-ID: <250@tekchips.UUCP> Date: Tue, 29-Jan-85 19:38:51 EST Article-I.D.: tekchips.250 Posted: Tue Jan 29 19:38:51 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 31-Jan-85 01:30:20 EST References: <186@ihnet.UUCP> Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR Lines: 38 ----------------------------- > what is the next function in the following sequence? > Allow me to use '^' for exponentiation. > y = 2 > y = 2*x > y = 2^x > ??? > Each operation evolve from an iteration of the previous (originally). > > ihnp4!ihnet!eklhad Addition, multiplication, exponentiation, ... form a sequence of operations each of which is defined in terms of repeated applications of the previous operation. Additional operations of the sequence don't seem to have any standard names because they are not of much use. In fact, I don't know of any use of these except in compuatability and complexity theories. Somewhere I saw the names tetration, pentation, hexation, etc. for the successive operations after exponentiation. The whole family of operations is represented by the (generalized, or original) Ackermann's function described, for example, in ``Elementary Computability, Formal Languages, and Automata'' by R. McNaughton, Prentice-Hall, 1982. I like to call theses operations n-ation, with 1-ation, 2-ation, 3-ation being the same as addition, multiplication, exponentiation, respectively. 0-ation is a special form of successor operation. These should formally be defined so that we will have a OP b = b+2 if a=b, b+1 otherwise 0 a OP b = a OP (a OP (a OP ... (a OP a)) ... )) n+1 n n n n ----------------------------------------- (b occurrences of a) The notation G(n) is used in ``Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms'' by Aho, Hopcroft, and Ullman for what we may call ``4-log base 2 of n'', i.e. G(n) = the least k such that 2 OP k >= n. 4