Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site tesla.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!tesla!novikoff From: novikoff@tesla.UUCP (Eric A. Novikoff) Newsgroups: net.med Subject: Unconventional Cancer Therapy Message-ID: <532@tesla.UUCP> Date: Thu, 31-Jan-85 17:26:29 EST Article-I.D.: tesla.532 Posted: Thu Jan 31 17:26:29 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Feb-85 11:03:07 EST Distribution: net Organization: Cornell University, Electrical Engineering Dept. Lines: 38 Is there anyone out there following the Gerson Cancer Therapy method? My mother, diagnosed as having CUPS (Cancer of Unknown Primary Source) is going through the treatment now, after having been told by her doctors at Kaiser Permanente (An HMO in California) that there was nothing that could be done. The Gerson therapy is a nutritional therapy in which the patient drinks pressed vegetable and liver juices on an hourly schedule, and can eat only cooked vegetables, baked potatoes, fruit, salads, etc. All salt and fats are forbidden, and five daily coffee enemas are also taken. The Gerson doctors claim a cure rate of over 60% - for people who are in advanced stages of cancer, having been through the rounds of conventional doctors. My mother, upon returning from the Gerson hospital, claimed that she saw amazing cures in which people's tumor masses shrunk visibly over a period of days. The diet is relatively innocuous (if one doesn't consider the work and willpower required to remain on it) and should not interfere with other therapy methods. The basic idea is to restore the patient's imuune system to full function by eliminating the bodily (metabolic ?) poisons which preoccupy the liver, allowing it to function at far above normal levels. Most conventional M.D.'s my mother has seen have been violently antagonistic towards her and the therapy. (Apparently they have heard of it.) Most of today's M.D.'s, especially oncologists, have not had any in-depth training even in standard nutritional principles, so I find it hard to understand why they are so against a treatment with such a possibility for success. Also amazingly enough, the AMA is so strongly against the Gerson therapy (and others like it) that they are currently sponsoring legislation to make it illegal to promulgate or engage in such therapies. As of now, it is illegal for the Gerson Center to mail Dr. Gerson's (Yes, he was a *real* M.D.) book in the United States, even though it does not advertise the treatment. Can't we decide what to do with our own bodies? Especially, as in my mother's case, when the doctors don't know what to do? Eric Novikoff (tesla!novikoff@Cornell.ARPA)