Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uiucdcsp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsp!forbus
From: forbus@uiucdcsp.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc
Subject: Re: Hard disk overhead?
Message-ID: <10800004@uiucdcsp.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 4-Feb-85 00:28:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsp.10800004
Posted: Mon Feb  4 00:28:00 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 29-Jan-85 07:02:45 EST
References: <10800003@uiucdcsp.UUCP>
Lines: 4
Nf-ID: #R:uiucdcsp:10800003:uiucdcsp:10800004:000:181
Nf-From: uiucdcsp!forbus    Jan 27 23:28:00 1985

Careful checking reveals that on COMPAQ's flavor of MS-DOS 2.0,
storage really is allocated in 4096 blocks as an earlier response
suggested.  Sigh.  Still, it beats time-sharing...