Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site allegra.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!dep
From: dep@allegra.UUCP (Dewayne Perry)
Newsgroups: net.music.classical
Subject: Re: Towards a Canonical Anniversary List
Message-ID: <3005@allegra.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 31-Jan-85 11:53:37 EST
Article-I.D.: allegra.3005
Posted: Thu Jan 31 11:53:37 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Feb-85 00:29:00 EST
References: <3000@allegra.UUCP> <20030@lanl.ARPA> <5051@tekecs.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 16

<the bug ate the complete list of anniversaries, so I sent out what was left.>

Thanks for the defense, Jeff.  The nice thing about the net readers is that
they either have an astounding inference engine or none at all.

In the context (do I really need to say this??), of Bach, Handel, etc,
the anniversary list is for those who have N00 or N50 th anniversaries
of either their births or deaths (in the case of N00, N>0; in the case
of N50, N>=0).

If I get around to it, I may add more to the list.  I just found an appendix
in the back of my Groves that lists composers and their contempories by
year.

Celebrate the lesser composers - they need it more than Bach or Handel.