Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cmu-cs-k.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cmu-cs-k!tim
From: tim@cmu-cs-k.ARPA (Tim Maroney)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: Confining the pornography debate
Message-ID: <20980089@cmu-cs-k.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 31-Jan-85 21:12:14 EST
Article-I.D.: cmu-cs-k.20980089
Posted: Thu Jan 31 21:12:14 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Feb-85 12:55:42 EST
References: <206@ttidcc.UUCP>
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 18

The pornography issue is essentially about sex.  There is, however, no
net.sex, for discussion of sexual issues.  I propose such a group be
created, and the pornography debate moved to there.

I think the idea of new top-level groups like "net.pornography" to
accomodate single discussions is a bad one.  A net.sex (or net.sexuality)
would solve the pornography debate problem while not being restricted to
discussion of pornography.

So I suppose the question is: Does the network have any interest in sex?
-=-
Tim Maroney, Carnegie-Mellon University Computation Center
ARPA:	Tim.Maroney@CMU-CS-K	uucp:	seismo!cmu-cs-k!tim
CompuServe:	74176,1360	audio:	shout "Hey, Tim!"

"Remember all ye that existence is pure joy; that all the sorrows are
but as shadows; they pass & are done; but there is that which remains."
Liber AL, II:9.