Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site scgvaxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!dciem!nrcaero!pesnta!pertec!scgvaxd!dan
From: dan@scgvaxd.UUCP (Dan Boskovich)
Newsgroups: net.religion,net.origins
Subject: Re: Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr! (On Creationism and Religion)
Message-ID: <259@scgvaxd.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 30-Jan-85 14:51:40 EST
Article-I.D.: scgvaxd.259
Posted: Wed Jan 30 14:51:40 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 1-Feb-85 21:17:20 EST
References: <202@decwrl.UUCP> <528@mhuxt.UUCP> <239@ihu1m.UUCP> <322@cybvax0.UUCP> <945@ihuxn.UUCP> <331@cybvax0.UUCP>
Reply-To: dan@scgvaxd.UUCP (Dan Boskovich)
Organization: Hughes Aircraft Co., El Segundo, CA
Lines: 31
Summary: 

In article <331@cybvax0.UUCP> mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) writes:
>In article <945@ihuxn.UUCP> jho@ihuxn.UUCP (Yosi Hoshen) writes:
>> 
>> >1) Creationism is not science.  It is religion.  Christians and only
>> >   Christians are the sole proponents.
>> 
>> This statement is not quite accurate. 
>> Ultra-orthodox Jews also believe in the Genesis account of creation.
>> And we should not forget Khumeini and his followers, they all belong 
>> to the creationists' crowd.
>
>Ooops.  You're right.  Ok, let me rephrase it, to make it more accurate.
>
>Creationism is not science.  It is religion.  Those who believe in the
>(purported) authority of Genesis are the sole proponents.
>
>Thanks, Yosi.  Any other criticisms?
>-- 
>
>Mike Huybensz		...decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh

Haven't you heard of the ICR (Institute of Creation Research) based in
San Diego? There are hundreds of Biologists, Chemists, and Physicists
who believe in creation science on the basis of scientific evidence alone.
There is as much SCIENTIFIC evidence behind Creation theory as there is
the Evolutionary theory. Please don't make statements that are not based
on scientific facts such as: (Creationism is not science. It is religion.)
If you would like some names, facts, etc. I would be glad to furnish them
upon demand.

					 Dan