Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site psivax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!dciem!nrcaero!pesnta!hplabs!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
From: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Re: Integrated Circuits. Part II.
Message-ID: <283@psivax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 29-Jan-85 13:58:45 EST
Article-I.D.: psivax.283
Posted: Tue Jan 29 13:58:45 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 1-Feb-85 21:19:54 EST
References: <658@uwmacc.UUCP> <32500020@uiucdcsb.UUCP>
Reply-To: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley friesen)
Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA
Lines: 23
Summary: 

In article <32500020@uiucdcsb.UUCP> miller@uiucdcsb.UUCP writes:
>>What is the *scientific* explanation for the existence of disease organisms,
>>according to "Scientific Creationism"?  No fair using religious arguments.
>>To do so defeats your purpose of showing that Creationism is scientific.
>
>This ties in with my comments about hereditary diseases, above.  Here, however,
>I must cry foul.  You ask a theological question (what is the purpose behind
>evil & diseases) & then restrict answers to nontheological territory.  Dubious
>debate tactics to be sure, but I hope I have nevertheless provided a satisfac-
>tory answer given those restrictions.
>
	No, No, No, you have misunderstood the question!  He was *not*
asking for the *purpose* of disease, he was asking for a *scientific
explanation* of disease. That is he wants a set of causational events
which led to the existance of disease, *not* a theological explanation
of the *reason*  why they exist.
-- 

				Sarima (Stanley Friesen)

{trwrb|allegra|cbosgd|hplabs|ihnp4|aero!uscvax!akgua}!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
 or
quad1!psivax!friesen