Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cybvax0.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!sdcsvax!dcdwest!ittvax!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh
From: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Re: Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
Message-ID: <333@cybvax0.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 27-Jan-85 19:41:02 EST
Article-I.D.: cybvax0.333
Posted: Sun Jan 27 19:41:02 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Feb-85 11:33:47 EST
References: <202@decwrl.UUCP> <528@mhuxt.UUCP> <239@ihu1m.UUCP> <322@cybvax0.UUCP> <80@tikal.UUCP>
Reply-To: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz)
Organization: Cybermation, Inc., Cambridge, MA
Lines: 20
Summary: 

In article <80@tikal.UUCP> shad@tikal.UUCP (Warren Shadwick) writes:
> In article <322@cybvax0.UUCP> mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) writes:
> >2) State support of religion is banned by our constitution.  That is why
> >   creationist "theory" is prevented from being taught in the schools by
> >   the legal system.  If you wish to change the constitution, feel free to
> >   try.
> Which constitution are you speaking of here? and what state?  This must
> be another instance of quoting the constitution of the USSR (the church
> and the state shall be separate).
> The U.S. Constituion has already been alterred by our legal system. The 
> current non-establishment clause (of Amendment 1) being interpreted as 
> a wall of separation and the free excercise clause being totally ignored.

I suppose you're trying to make some sort of rhetorical point, because you
identify first ammendment in your second paragraph.  If you'd like to say
something, why not spit it out, and quit pussyfooting around with vague
insults and assertions?
-- 

Mike Huybensz		...decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh