Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site teldata.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tikal!cholula!teldata!shad
From: shad@teldata.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Re: Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr! (1st Amendment)
Message-ID: <502@teldata.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 4-Feb-85 16:42:52 EST
Article-I.D.: teldata.502
Posted: Mon Feb  4 16:42:52 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 7-Feb-85 02:20:36 EST
References: <202@decwrl.UUCP> <528@mhuxt.UUCP> <239@ihu1m.UUCP> <322@cybvax0.UUCP> <80@tikal.UUCP> <333@cybvax0.UUCP>
Reply-To: shad@teldata.UUCP (Warren Shadwick)
Organization: Teltone Corp., Kirkland, WA
Lines: 21

In article <333@cybvax0.UUCP> mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) writes:

> > The U.S. Constituion has already been alterred by our legal system. The 
> > current non-establishment clause (of Amendment 1) being interpreted as 
> > a wall of separation and the free excercise clause being totally ignored.
> 
> I suppose you're trying to make some sort of rhetorical point, because you
> identify first ammendment in your second paragraph.  If you'd like to say
> something, why not spit it out, and quit pussyfooting around with vague
> insults and assertions?

If anything, I was trying to avoid insult.  I took exception to misquoting 
our Constitution in the original article.  The courts have perverted the 
intent of the 1st Amendment.  Try reading the Constitution and see if it 
states that there shall be "no state funding of religion."  Or if it states 
"religion shall be separate from education."

-- 

Warren N. Shadwick
... ihnp4!uw-beaver!tikal!shad