Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site fortune.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!fortune!brower
From: brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard Brower)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Harper's
Message-ID: <4971@fortune.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 6-Feb-85 12:43:21 EST
Article-I.D.: fortune.4971
Posted: Wed Feb  6 12:43:21 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 7-Feb-85 04:15:10 EST
References: <697@uwmacc.UUCP>
Reply-To: brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard brower)
Distribution: net
Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 15
Summary: 

In article <697@uwmacc.UUCP> dubois@uwmacc.UUCP (Paul DuBois) writes:
>I am not a biologist either.  I guess anything I might
>propose about evolution is similarly invalid by virtue of not being
>proposed by a biologist.  The logical extension is of course that should
>we desire knowledge of evolution we should bow to the keepers of the
>Truth, the biologists, saying "surely you are the people, and wisdom
>shall die with you!"  Which brings us round again to authority.  Or
>perhaps, religion?
>You may suppose that I am overreacting.  I assure you that I am.

No, you should learn something about biology.  When you are well enough
informed to make rational decisions, you will be an evolutionist also.8-)
-- 
Richard A. Brower		Fortune Systems
{ihnp4,ucbvax!amd,hpda,sri-unix,harpo}!fortune!brower