Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rochester.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!whuxlm!akgua!mcnc!decvax!genrad!teddy!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!nemo
From: nemo@rochester.UUCP (Wolfe)
Newsgroups: net.rec.nude
Subject: Re: Photography and Naturism
Message-ID: <5634@rochester.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 23-Jan-85 20:42:25 EST
Article-I.D.: rocheste.5634
Posted: Wed Jan 23 20:42:25 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 28-Jan-85 05:54:46 EST
References: <303@wjvax.UUCP> <ittvax.1604> <1387@cca.UUCP>
Organization: U. of Rochester, CS Dept.
Lines: 11

> These people who seem to feel that they have a right to photograph others
> without their consent are definitely way "off base".  Whether the subject
> of their photos is clothed or unclothed, the principle remains the same--
> if the subject is to be specifically selected for a photo, he/she should
> be given the opportunity to voice their opinion in the matter.  This is
> simply a matter of being considerate.
>  
While I agree about the consideration part of this, there are plenty of
test cases in the law books about the right of anyone to take anyone's
picture in a public place.  
Nemo