Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!sdcsvax!dcdwest!ittvax!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!ron From: ron@brl-tgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie ) Newsgroups: net.rec.nude Subject: Re: Photography and Naturism Message-ID: <7753@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Sun, 27-Jan-85 16:59:08 EST Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.7753 Posted: Sun Jan 27 16:59:08 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Feb-85 11:34:16 EST References: <303@wjvax.UUCP> <1387@cca.UUCP> Organization: Ballistic Research Lab Lines: 14 > These people who seem to feel that they have a right to photograph others > without their consent are definitely way "off base". Whether the subject > of their photos is clothed or unclothed, the principle remains the same-- > if the subject is to be specifically selected for a photo, he/she should > be given the opportunity to voice their opinion in the matter. This is > simply a matter of being considerate. > Hey, I was just reacting to the person who claimed it was illegal to take the pictures. In my letter, I specifically stated that it was not very nice. I believe the analogy was to staring into my neighbors appartment with binoculars. -Ron