Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: notesfiles Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpfcmp!rjn From: rjn@hpfcmp.UUCP (rjn) Newsgroups: net.rec.photo Subject: Re: Orphaned Response Message-ID: <20000001@hpfcmp.UUCP> Date: Sun, 13-Jan-85 16:12:00 EST Article-I.D.: hpfcmp.20000001 Posted: Sun Jan 13 16:12:00 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 29-Jan-85 07:29:01 EST References: <-521500@duke.UUCP> Lines: 36 Nf-ID: #R:duke:-521500:hpfcmp:20000001:37777777600:1488 Nf-From: hpfcmp!rjn Jan 22 13:12:00 1985 re: FD35-105 on Canon A-1 I have this same combo (as well as an FD50/1.4, FD50macro, FD70-120, RF500 [mirror] and 2x extender). The 35-105 is the lens I leave on the camera most of the time. The 500(!) is the next most used. My girlfriend also has an A-1 and 35-105. I use her 24mm for the wider shots. Advantages: * Excellent "snapshot" lens, covers most casual situations. * Matches coverage of typical flash units - I use a 199A and a 533G, and its nice not to have to fool around with wide or tele adaptors as I zoom. * Acceptable image quality - it takes better pictures than I do. I have never found a 3rd-party lens that met this requirement, especially zooms. Non-Canon lenses tend to be dark and/or out of focus in the corners. Most also still use the old breech-lock ring mount. * Two-ring - you can zoom without upsetting the focus. * Size - it fits [mounted] in most camera bags. My girlfriend keeps her's in a small "holster" type bag. Disadvantages: * Front element rotates as you focus. This makes the use of a polarizing filter a nuisance. You also can't use a "cutaway" lens hood. * Front element is 72mm. Filters are therefore expensive. * Two ring - focusing-while-zooming takes practice. * A low end of 28mm focal length would have been more useful. Trusting that this is useful... Bob Niland Hewlett-Packard Ft. Collins. CO [hplabs!]hpfcla!rjn