Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site shark.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!shark!net.flame
From: net.flame@shark.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: MHCS results
Message-ID: <1229@shark.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 25-Jan-85 03:48:41 EST
Article-I.D.: shark.1229
Posted: Fri Jan 25 03:48:41 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 27-Jan-85 05:36:20 EST
Sender: hutch@shark.UUCP
Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR
Lines: 32

From: shark!shark!hutch (Stephen Hutchison)


In article <168@cadre.ARPA> geb@cadre.ARPA (Gordon E. Banks) writes:
>In article <484@ecsvax.UUCP> dgary@ecsvax.UUCP writes:
>><>
>>RE Whether Mormons are Christians...
>>
>>
>>The Mormon religion has some curious doctrines.  Again, if I am not
>>mistaken, it is possible for a good person to aspire to godhood.  Even
>>the God to whom we pray was once a mortal man, they contend.  Women,
>>unfortunately, cannot become gods or goddesses themselves, but must
>>connect up to a successful male priest and ultimately, I presume, become
>>"goddettes."
>>
>You are wrong about the women, they can become gods.
>The Mormons even have a female diety who is the wife of the male God.  

Indeed?  Have the rules changed (again) or isn't it still necessary for
a woman to be married before she can be given deistic status (presumably
by her deified husband)?

Oh, I see, Gordon misunderstood dgary's article!

Incidentally, do Blacks have real souls this week, or do they still have
second-class souls which will never become "gods"?

I know, this is nasty, but I AM posting to net.flame and net.religion,
not to the thousands of newsgroups where the original articles were sent!

Hutch