Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site cbdkc1.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!ask From: ask@cbdkc1.UUCP (A.S. Kamlet) Newsgroups: net.religion.jewish Subject: Re: Re: questions Message-ID: <864@cbdkc1.UUCP> Date: Sun, 3-Feb-85 15:01:31 EST Article-I.D.: cbdkc1.864 Posted: Sun Feb 3 15:01:31 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 4-Feb-85 05:30:09 EST References: <252@teklds.UUCP> <308@moscom.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus Lines: 57 > David Esan (!moscom!de) > > karen alias larryg > > First of all, if God is not a person, then what about the appearance > > to Abraham, Jacob and Moses? How could Abraham and God be friends, and > > didn't God speak to people individually? > > We hold that G-d does not have a form and is everywhere. If you check his > appearances to the Patriarchs you will find that he always appeared in a > dream. Moses is the single person in the Bible to whom G-d spoke face to > face. Well, perhaps. "You cannot see My face, for Man shall not see Me and live." --Exodus XXXIII, 20. "...I will put you in a cleft of the rock, and it shall come to pass while My glory passes by, that I will put you in a cleft of the rock, and will cover you with My hand until I have passed by. And I will take away My hand, and you shall see my back; but my face shall not be seen." --Exodus XXXIII, 22-23. > We are taught that this reference, and the reference of the Egyptians > to the finger of G-d, and the passing of G-d over the Jewish homes and through > Egypt during the plague of the deaths of the first-born, are but allegorical. > a primitive person, and even many sophisticated people, have trouble dealing > with a god with no body or form. These descriptions are not(!!!) literal, > but figurative. > > > Jesus taught that the temple was no longer made of human hands, I think > > there is a reference to this in the Bible, not New Testament, but now > > God wants to dwell in the human heart. > > I would like a reference to this source. Too much of the Bible has been > mistranslated to accept a memory rather than a quote. > I second the request for a reference from T'N'CH (What is often called the old testament.) > > Jesus claimed to be a descendent of David and the first > > and last king. > > While this response belongs in net.religion, and part of the article was > lost by a bad terminal at the source, I must respond quickly. This is > a strange claim, since the descendant of David in the Christian Bible is > Joseph not Mary, who according to dogma bore no genetic link to Jesus. > > David Esan (!moscom!de) I won't make the claim that I'm a decendent of David; but I might be. In fact, if someone could prove to me tomorrow that I was, I'd probably say, "Well, how about that?" and go right on with my business. > > that's all for now since my terminal is going on the fritz. > > > > karen alias larryg -- Art Kamlet AT&T Bell Laboratories Columbus {ihnp4 | cbosgd}!cbrma!ask