Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihlpg.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!ihlpg!jcgowl
From: jcgowl@ihlpg.UUCP (r. gowland)
Newsgroups: net.singles,net.social
Subject: Re: Living in sin? (why marriages fail)
Message-ID: <120@ihlpg.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 1-Feb-85 12:15:31 EST
Article-I.D.: ihlpg.120
Posted: Fri Feb  1 12:15:31 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Feb-85 13:49:06 EST
References: <198@tekred.UUCP> <1091@houxm.UUCP>, <2294@nsc.UUCP> <4994@utzoo.UUCP> <119@ihlpg.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 21
Xref: watmath net.singles:5742 net.social:445

SINCE IHLPG DECIDED TO POST THE INCOMPLETE ITEM, I SHALL CONTINUE
IT HERE...

It is not the institution which counts, it is the LOVE for your
partner which makes it all worthwhile. You can't plan your
development (anyone in Software knows that) but if you LOVE
someone then you will meet their needs. If they love you then
they will continue to meet your needs.

Maybe I am in love with love I am definitely in love with my wife
and we have changed considerably since we married in 1972.
We continue to communicate our changing needs and because of love
we continue to meet our changing needs. Sometimes we argue when
we can't agree on a point, but love helps us together again.

I must end this now before all you readers puke on your
keyboards. Who is this sloppy sentimentalist?
Its...
ihlpg!jcgowl Roger R. Gowland at Indian Hill (temporarily)
longing to get back to his wife and 3.6 kids in England.
(fourth due last week in April)