Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!ka
From: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist)
Newsgroups: net.unix,net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: sort problems
Message-ID: <1007@hou3c.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 21-Jan-85 17:04:58 EST
Article-I.D.: hou3c.1007
Posted: Mon Jan 21 17:04:58 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 23-Jan-85 04:39:32 EST
References: <2040@pegasus.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 26
Xref: watmath net.unix:3406 net.unix-wizards:11663

> Okay you sort experts why do these two sorts not work ?
> 
> sort << !
>  Abe
> Aba
> !
>
> With no matter what combination of sort options I use
> I can't Aba to come out first (except of course -r).

Try "sort -b +0".  The +0 causes it to sort on the first field, and
the -b causes it to ignore leading blanks in determining the start
of the first field.

> sort << !
> Abe
> $Aba
> !
> 
> The '$' seems to screw something up and it comes back with that line empty.

This has nothing to do with sort.  The shell will normally expand
shell variables inside text included by "<<".  Since $Aba has not
been set, it is replaced with the null string.  To suppress this
behavior, substitute "<<\!" for "<<!".  See sh(1) for more details.
					Kenneth Almquist