Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site gitpyr.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxj!houxm!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!gitpyr!owens
From: owens@gitpyr.UUCP (Gerald Owens)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: yet more on porn
Message-ID: <44@gitpyr.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 21-Jan-85 10:51:51 EST
Article-I.D.: gitpyr.44
Posted: Mon Jan 21 10:51:51 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 24-Jan-85 07:01:45 EST
References: <1511V6M@PSUVM> <5016@tekecs.UUCP>
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology
Lines: 26

> > Last week I summarizied a section on sexual morality from an adult Catholic
> > catechism which seemed to answer most of what the non-anti-porn and pro-porn
> > were objecting to from the anti-porn people.  I'll try to re-post if anybody
> > wants it.
> > 
> Why should I care what the Catholic catechism has to say about it? It may 
> answer the question for devout Catholics, but the USA isn't the Vatican.
> 
> > Censorship is not intrinsically evil, but unless my Church is doing it,
> > I don't trust the censor!!!!  Therefor unless there is consensu on the clear
> > and present danger of an item then censorship of porn is nontenable.
> 
> I don't trust anyone to do it, especially no churches, yours or anyone else's.
> For that reason I absolutely agree with the your last quoted sentence.
> 
> 			Why do I feel this is turning into net.religion? 
>                                          Jeff Winslow

    At last count, I found three references to religion in a backlog of
over a hundred messages.  Watch it.  Your prejudice is showing...


-- 
Gerald Owens
Georgia Insitute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
...!{akgua,allegra,amd,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo,ut-ngp}!gatech!gitpyr!owens