Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!mordor!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm
From: kjm@ut-ngp.UUCP (Ken Montgomery)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Perhaps my question isn't so simple
Message-ID: <1331@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 15-Feb-85 23:15:49 EST
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.1331
Posted: Fri Feb 15 23:15:49 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 18-Feb-85 05:36:10 EST
References: <28000028@uiucdcsb.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: U.Texas Computation Center, Austin, Texas
Lines: 20

[]

Brad Andrews writes:
>Also, in regard to a previous response, what about those babies who are born
>alive during an attempted abortion?  Are then now "human", to be saved at all
>costs, or are they still a "parsisite"(as you imply), to be killed off?
>
>                                Brad

Why are humans "to be saved *at all costs*"?  [emphasis mine...]
Who will bear these costs?  Are you meaning to imply that people
who wish to refuse treatment should have it forced on them?

--
The above viewpoints are mine.  They are unrelated to
those of anyone else, including my cats and my employer.

Ken Montgomery  "Shredder-of-hapless-smurfs"
...!{ihnp4,allegra,seismo!ut-sally}!ut-ngp!kjm  [Usenet, when working]
kjm@ut-ngp.ARPA  [for Arpanauts only]