Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site epsilon.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!egs From: egs@epsilon.UUCP (Ed Sheppard) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: Gosh, I hope this doesn't bury me Message-ID: <34@epsilon.UUCP> Date: Tue, 19-Feb-85 14:19:14 EST Article-I.D.: epsilon.34 Posted: Tue Feb 19 14:19:14 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 22-Feb-85 07:04:27 EST References: <1330@hou4b.UUCP>, <806@druxo.UUCP> Organization: BELLCORE, Livingston, NJ Lines: 28 Nancy Parson writes: > (By the way, pro-lifers, it is your unwillingness > to deal with this issue, more than anything else in my opinion, that > discredits you in the eyes of many women who see you as utterly unconcerned > for them. You are willing to tell them to sacrifice for the life of an > unborn child, but are you willing to insist on men "sacrificing careers" > so that the burden is shared?) This is n'th time we've heard this sort of statement. I'm getting a tad sick of it myself. I'd like to find out how universal this type of sentiment is in the abortion debate. What do you (both pro-choice and pro-life) believe motivates the opposition. Do you consider them to be heartless, unconcerned, etc. pursuing a (primarily) politically motivated campaign, determined to shove their ideology/moral standards down other people's throats? Or are they honest in their convictions but simply misguided? Consider this a poll: respond to me and I'll summarize to the net in a while. BTW, Nancy. I'd be interested in how many notes you got from people about following up in net.women in addition to net.abortion. Recently, I followed up to an article here that was cross-posted to another (or maybe two other) newsgroup(s) and forgot to edit the distribution. I got several notes admonishing me for it (quite politely, I'm happy to say). As you can see, I'm being more careful now. Do net.women readers want to see the abortion debate going on there? Ed Sheppard Bellcore