Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekcbi.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!hplabs!tektronix!tekig!tekcbi!jeffg
From: jeffg@tekcbi.UUCP (Jeff Glover)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Dodge Charger?
Message-ID: <183@tekcbi.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Feb-85 12:24:11 EST
Article-I.D.: tekcbi.183
Posted: Fri Feb 22 12:24:11 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 27-Feb-85 09:29:51 EST
References: <707@inuxd.UUCP>
Reply-To: jeffg@tekcbi.UUCP (Jeff Glover)
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 21

In article <707@inuxd.UUCP> jla@inuxd.UUCP (Joyce Andrews) writes:
...
>
>I am going to look at Chargers with 2.2 liter engines (NO turbo--
>I am not going to sit in the AT&T parking lot every morning
>cooling off my turbo.  I don't need complications in my life!
>Anything that can't cool off at the same speed I can is a
>complication.)
...
>
>                      Joyce Andrews
>                      ihnp4!inuxc!inuxd!jla

Does anybody have the facts on the statement that the turbo must be cooled
down?  Seems kinda strange in this day of high-tech that they'd leave
something so self-destructive uncorrected.
-- 
Jeff C. Glover, Tektronix, Inc. PO Box 500, MS Y6-546, Beaverton, OR 97077
{ psu-eea,masscomp,decvax,allegra,uf-cgrl,mit-eddie,mit-ems,uoregon,psu-cs,
  orstcs,zehntel,ucbcad,ucbvax,purdue,uw-beaver,reed,ogcvax,ihnp4,tekred,
  minn-ua,cbosg }!tektronix!tekcbi!jeffg