Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lanl.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!lanl!crs
From: crs@lanl.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.books,net.women
Subject: Re: Pornography doesn't degrade women ...
Message-ID: <21804@lanl.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 19-Feb-85 09:24:40 EST
Article-I.D.: lanl.21804
Posted: Tue Feb 19 09:24:40 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 21-Feb-85 05:12:07 EST
References: cbosgd.800, <243@looking.UUCP> <11300010@smu.UUCP> <4560@cbscc.UUCP> <354@ahuta. <1836@browngr.UUCP>
Sender: newsreader@lanl.ARPA
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lines: 11
Xref: linus net.books:1351 net.women:3982

> 
>    On the issue of free speech: I think that one of the Supreme court rulings on
> pornnogrphy (or perhaps some other free-speech or right issue) stated, roughly,
> that these rights are easy to grant to the poeple whose ideas we condone,
> but the function of the laws and the duty of the courts was to preserve those
> rights precisely for those with whom we most vehemently disagree.
>    I beg you to ask yourself, "Why did they say this?"

An EXCELLENT point!

Charlie