Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2.fluke 9/24/84; site fluke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!microsoft!fluke!tron
From: tron@fluke.UUCP (Peter Barbee)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.politics,net.books
Subject: Re: Beyond Marchionni and Dubuc (and Winslow) [PORNOGRAPHY]
Message-ID: <901@vax1.fluke.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 19-Feb-85 17:24:55 EST
Article-I.D.: vax1.901
Posted: Tue Feb 19 17:24:55 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 22-Feb-85 21:49:42 EST
References: <pyuxd.415415, <1520V6M@PSUVM> <5030@tekecs.UUCP>@pyuxd.UUCP> <1520V6M@PSUVM> <5030@tekecs.UUCP> <1826@browngr.UUCP>
Reply-To: tron@fluke.UUCP (Peter Barbee)
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA
Lines: 21
Xref: watmath net.women:4511 net.politics:7702 net.books:1460

Spike,

You say,

>getting rid of this symptom might
>help prevent the spread of perverse attitudes. 

in reference to the pornagraphy debate.  When you label someone else's attitude
as perverse and are willing to legislate against it you are making morality a
legal issue.  That is fine as long as you are aware that your attitudes may
seem perverse to whomever holds the power next.

Sincerely,
Peter B

decvax-+-uw-beaver-+
ihnp4--+   allegra-+
ucbvax----lbl-csam-+--fluke!tron
	       sun-+
	   ssc-vax-+
: