Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site down.FUN
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harpo!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!mhuxb!mhuxr!ulysses!allegra!princeton!down!honey
From: honey@down.FUN (code 101)
Newsgroups: net.bugs.uucp
Subject: Re: 4.2 uucp performance problems?
Message-ID: <448@down.FUN>
Date: Tue, 19-Feb-85 01:07:29 EST
Article-I.D.: down.448
Posted: Tue Feb 19 01:07:29 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 21-Feb-85 05:13:29 EST
References: <1363@hao.UUCP> <13500001@uicsl.UUCP> <442@down.FUN> <374@men1.UUCP>
Organization: Princeton University, EECS
Lines: 14

if you are running system v, you can ignore all of this because you
have a superior tty line discipline -- use it.  if you are running
something else, and you have an inferior v7 based line disc., then you
must use something else.  like a loop around a register.  (this is how
honey danber naps under under system v (for smart modem delays), so
it must be the right thing to do.)

if you can add to your kernel, you can have nap().  (it's not a real
unix until it's been hacked for uucp.)  i have seen several of them
flash past on net.sources in days of yore.  or just about anybody could
find the right sequence of spl7, timeout, sleep, splx to roll his own.
her own.  whatever.

	peter