Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcc6.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc6!ix654
From: ix654@sdcc6.UUCP (ix654)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.flame
Subject: Re: Reagan and Qadaffi
Message-ID: <1912@sdcc6.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 13-Feb-85 19:32:44 EST
Article-I.D.: sdcc6.1912
Posted: Wed Feb 13 19:32:44 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 15-Feb-85 05:37:56 EST
References: <1369@dciem.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center
Lines: 17
Xref: watmath net.politics:7590 net.flame:8346

> According to our newpaper reports of the State of the Union address,
> US media hid or ignored Reagan's use of Libyan rhetoric: that the <Nation>
> had a right and duty to aid "freedom fighters" against the <oppressor
> nation> wherever they might be fighting.
> According to our newspapers, Congress cheered.
> Sad, isn't it.
> -- 
> Martin Taylor
> {allegra,linus,ihnp4,floyd,ubc-vision}!utzoo!dciem!mmt
> {uw-beaver,qucis,watmath}!utcsrgv!dciem!mmt

     If you ask me, I'd rather live in "freedom" as defined by
R. R. than in the one constructed under Quadaffi's guidelines.
Equating the two seems rather simplistic (and sad) to me. 
   
                                      E.J. Behr, UCSD
                                       (sdcc6!ix654)