Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!umcp-cs!mangoe From: mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Homophobia Message-ID: <3248@umcp-cs.UUCP> Date: Wed, 13-Feb-85 17:03:36 EST Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.3248 Posted: Wed Feb 13 17:03:36 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 15-Feb-85 23:45:48 EST References: <514@hou5g.UUCP> <3087@umcp-cs.UUCP> <4998@fortune.UUCP> Distribution: na Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD Lines: 30 Xref: seismo net.flame:8655 In article <4998@fortune.UUCP> brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard brower) writes: >As for your last sentence: >Is your fear of practicing homosexuality based on the fact the you are >afraid of what the neighbors will say? Does numerical superiority imply >better? Ah yes, homophobia again.... Is it true that practicing homosexuality allows one to read other's minds? No? Then how is it that you conclude that I fear homosexuality? I submit that you have DECIDED that suffer from [gasp] HOMOPHOBIA!!!!!!!! because it's rhetorically convenient. It's always handy to be able to attribute one's opponent's views to psychological motivations rather than go through the trouble of actually having to rebut their arguments. Well, now, let's try that shoe on the other foot.... What if homosexuals accusations of homophobia against their opponents were caused by deep-seated insecurities about the rightness of homosexuality? Gee, that shoe seems to fit REAL well on that foot too.... I find arguments about the other side's psychological motivations to be rubbish, unless (of course) they're backed up with some hard evidence. As in this case, they are normally a sign of a weak argument. Oh, by the way.... My statement about numerical superiority was directed at the questions, not homosexuality per se. I don't think much of the notion of majority morality. Charley Wingate umcp-cs!mangoe