Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uok.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!ihnp1!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uok!dswankii
From: dswankii@uok.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Re: Handguns.
Message-ID: <22100018@uok.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 13-Feb-85 11:00:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uok.22100018
Posted: Wed Feb 13 11:00:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 16-Feb-85 04:47:46 EST
References: <1044@ihuxe.UUCP>
Lines: 16
Nf-ID: #R:ihuxe:-104400:uok:22100018:000:685
Nf-From: uok!dswankii    Feb 13 10:00:00 1985



It is not illegal to own a handgun in England. It is not illegal to own 
ammo for it. It is not illegal to own a semi-auto rifle. It is highly
controled. As I see it, the problem is not that people want to control
handguns, they want to ban them ( Remember, it's the National Coalition
to Ban Handguns - NOT The National Coalition to Rigorously Control 
Handguns). I would not mind laws that made it difficult to purchase
a handgun if that meant that law abiding people that want a handgun could
get one. Unfortunatly the penguin butts that make the laws in this country
are on an "all or nothing" kick. 


				David Swank II
				University of Oklahoma
				ctvax!uokvax!uok!dswankii