Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watdcsu.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!watdcsu!dmcanzi
From: dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi)
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.politics,net.music
Subject: Re: White greed
Message-ID: <972@watdcsu.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 16-Feb-85 20:04:46 EST
Article-I.D.: watdcsu.972
Posted: Sat Feb 16 20:04:46 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 17-Feb-85 06:03:22 EST
References: <293@cmu-cs-cad.ARPA> <80@spar.UUCP>
Reply-To: dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi)
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 20
Xref: watmath net.flame:8378 net.politics:7614 net.music:6115
Summary: 

In article <80@spar.UUCP> ellis@spar.UUCP (Michael Ellis) writes:
>
>	White people are enjoying an inheritance that was STOLEN by
>	300 years of slavery and 100 years of legal and social prejudice.
>
>    Until white people recognize that they are simply being asked to
>    share their ill-gotten gains, there will be little room for intelligent
>    debate about anything.

The majority of whites have acquired what they own by working for it.  If
their employer payed them with stolen wealth, who is guilty of living off
of the proceeds of theft?  The employee or the employer?

Suppose, for the sake of argument, that the employee is to be considered
guilty of sharing in stolen goods.  In that case, the requests from 
blacks for special advantages in employment, is a request for a share
of what has been stolen from other blacks.  I can see that this is a
highly moral position.

	David Canzi, greedy white boy