Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site entropy.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!uw-june!entropy!fetrow
From: fetrow@entropy.UUCP (David Fetrow)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.flame
Subject: Re: Reagan and Qadaffi
Message-ID: <141@entropy.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 16-Feb-85 17:34:04 EST
Article-I.D.: entropy.141
Posted: Sat Feb 16 17:34:04 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 20-Feb-85 03:34:52 EST
References: <1369@dciem.UUCP> <1912@sdcc6.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: UW MathStat, Seattle
Lines: 22
Xref: watmath net.politics:7665 net.flame:8427

> 
>      If you ask me, I'd rather live in "freedom" as defined by
> R. R. than in the one constructed under Quadaffi's guidelines.
> Equating the two seems rather simplistic (and sad) to me. 
>    
>                                       E.J. Behr, UCSD
>                                        (sdcc6!ix654)

 No arguement when it comes to the situation internal to the two
countries, maybe no arguement that RR has a concept of freedom in
mind that is better than Q but that doesn't mean the effects aren't
exactly the same: a lot of dying, some high sounding words, and the
establishment of a dictatorship inside another soverign state. Not to
mention the equation: feedom fighter = antisocialist, seems to be
invoked all to often. They aren't always the same thing.


-- 
  -"Daphnia Dave" Fetrow
    Kludgemaster  of CQS

{ ihnp4, fluke, microsof, tektronix }!uw-beaver!entropy!fetrow