Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uiucdcs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!harpo!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!kaufman
From: kaufman@uiucdcs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Re: multiple postings
Message-ID: <36200190@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 21-Feb-85 11:27:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.36200190
Posted: Thu Feb 21 11:27:00 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 24-Feb-85 02:53:41 EST
References: <351@enmasse.UUCP>
Lines: 15
Nf-ID: #R:enmasse:-35100:uiucdcs:36200190:000:804
Nf-From: uiucdcs!kaufman    Feb 21 10:27:00 1985


You know the multiple posting stuff has really gone overboard when:

You read three articles saying "Keep this crap out of net.music", and you're
reading net.flame.  Perhaps, the eternal optimist says, those three were
good examples of netiquitte, and not posted where they could clutter a
fine (????) discussion of music.  NAAAAAHHHHHH!  I have a sneaking suspicion
that the next time I read net.music, I will be greeted by those three oh too
familiar flames.  Worse yet, I'll probably read them again in net.unix.wizards
or something. Should I have misjudged this situation, my apologies go out to
those people who were both competent enough and conscientious enough to
restrict their postings.

Ken Kaufman (uiucdcs!kaufman)
"Because I haven't been flamed in a while, I will include a spelling eror."