Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!lindley
From: lindley@ut-ngp.UUCP (John L. Templer)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: imputed income tax
Message-ID: <1364@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Feb-85 23:08:16 EST
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.1364
Posted: Fri Feb 22 23:08:16 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 27-Feb-85 05:11:38 EST
Organization: U.Texas Physics Department; Austin, Texas
Lines: 21

>  . . . . . Better: Tax not only income but imputed income. That is,
> given you are married and your wife does not work, she would still pay
> tax on the imputed income of the rent for her abode. Same for
> children.
> 
> Waiting for flames,
> Brad Miller
> -- 
> ..[cbrma, ccivax, ccicpg, rayssd, ritcv, rlgvax, rochester]!ccice5!ccice2!bwm

Brilliant Brad, then a husband and father of two children can look
forward to having his income taxed FOUR times.  While your at it, why
don't you make the dog, cat, and parakeet pay too.
-- 

                                           John L. Templer
                                     University of Texas at Austin

    {allegra,gatech,seismo!ut-sally,vortex}!ut-ngp!lindley

                 "Gongo Bunnies movin' in,