Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!mangoe
From: mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Followup, Mr. Wingate?
Message-ID: <3654@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 26-Feb-85 13:17:43 EST
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.3654
Posted: Tue Feb 26 13:17:43 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 27-Feb-85 23:56:53 EST
References: <278@cmu-cs-k.ARPA> <580@pyuxd.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD
Lines: 25

>>   By the
>> way, I was not amused by your "followup-to" line, which attempted to
>> prevent me from responding in net.religion.  Your motivations are as
>> transparent as usual, jerk.  [MARONEY IN RESPONSE TO WINGATE]

[Enter wry tone of voice]
One can see from the evidence that net.flame would indeed have been more
appropriate.
[Exit wryness]

>This seems to be a common tactic by Charley Wingate.  Set his "Followup-to:"
>line to "net.flame", as a means of (hopefully?) preventing people from
>responding and rebutting to his offering in the forum in which it was
>offered.  Nice try, Chuckles, but apparently I'm not the only one who's
>seen through your tripe this time.  You have some set of balls to attack my
>articles in net.religion.whatever when YOU make use of a slimy tactic like
>that.

Funny, this one seems to be misposted too....:-)

Quit whimpering, Rich.  No reason in the world why you can't change the group
back to the forum you wish to contaminate.  I was trying to assist you in
the choice of an appropriate group for articles such as the two I quote from.

Charley Wingate    umcp-cs!mangoe