Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84 chuqui version 1.7 9/23/84; site nsc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!amd!nsc!chuqui
From: chuqui@nsc.UUCP (The Phantom)
Newsgroups: net.news,net.followup
Subject: Re: Recruiter Responds (long)
Message-ID: <2391@nsc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 25-Feb-85 02:16:55 EST
Article-I.D.: nsc.2391
Posted: Mon Feb 25 02:16:55 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 25-Feb-85 06:19:18 EST
References: <259@sol1.UUCP> <257@unm-la.UUCP>
Reply-To: chuqui@nsc.UUCP (The Phantom)
Distribution: na
Organization: The Paradise
Lines: 21
Xref: utcs net.news:2750 net.followup:4398
Summary: 

In article <257@unm-la.UUCP> jay@unm-la.UUCP writes:
>My opinion is that it is not appropriate etiquette in any forum to 
>air private communications without the consent of the author.

I have to agree-- private mail should be considered that-- private. If I
mail something to someone I expect it to be kept in confidence unless I
allow its distribution-- this is common courtesy, and I try to do the same
for others. We had a major problem with this a while back with a fair
amount of private correspondence from unc that got posted, and it made the
situation worse.

I'd like to point out that the article this is a response of a response of,
from the Solution site, most (if not all-- I'm not sure) of the included
quotes were from postings, not private letters.

chuq
-- 
From behind the eight ball:                       Chuq Von Rospach
{cbosgd,fortune,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo}!nsc!chuqui   nsc!chuqui@decwrl.ARPA

We'll be recording at the Paradise Friday night. Live, on the Death label.