Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site talcott.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!jak
From: jak@talcott.UUCP (Joe Konstan)
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: Re: Defending Nassau Hall
Message-ID: <287@talcott.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 23-Feb-85 21:08:11 EST
Article-I.D.: talcott.287
Posted: Sat Feb 23 21:08:11 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 27-Feb-85 03:58:39 EST
References: <1980@inmet.UUCP> <753@ecsvax.UUCP>
Organization: Harvard University
Lines: 17

D. Gary Grady writes:
> I can't believe I'm the first person to point this out, but...  Recently
> someone attempted a dig at Princeton by pointing out that they were
> going to give a degree to Brooke Shields.  (The implication being that
> this showed how low Princeton would stoop, if I read between the bytes
> correctly.)  Isn't anyone else offended by the notion that
> attractiveness == stupidity suggested by this line of "reasoning"?  Does
> anyone have any evidence that Brooke Shields is dumber than the average
> Princeton undergraduate?  It may appeal to your sense of proportion that
> Looks + Smarts = a constant, but *really* now...

"When you die you lose an important part of your life" (or something
like that)
					- B.S.	

Mithrandir
jak@talcott