Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 8/23/84; site ucbcad.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad!faustus
From: faustus@ucbcad.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.games.frp
Subject: Re: Gripe
Message-ID: <119@ucbcad.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Feb-85 14:23:01 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbcad.119
Posted: Fri Feb 22 14:23:01 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 27-Feb-85 02:38:28 EST
References: <360@snow.UUCP> <3388@alice.UUCP> <155@sdcc13.UUCP> <4899@ukc.UUCP>
Organization: UC Berkeley CAD Group, Berkeley, CA
Lines: 17

(A description of how bad this hypothetical A(D*2) is, which most of
us are painfully aware of, and how Dragonfly is much better, which I
can well believe...)

> This isn't very good to beginners to frp, but to people
> disillusioned with A(D*2), it is perfect.
> 
> TRS took over the company that published Dragonfly, and stopped
> it from being published, to stop it competing with A(D*2).
> 
> I would be most pleased to hear your views on my hypothesis.

I think that the people who were publishing Dragonfly weren't very
interested in improving the state of FRP's on the market. If anybody,
I would blame them...

	Wayne