Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!bedford!mintaka!Gor#f@mit-eddie.ARPA From: Gor#f@mit-eddie.ARPA Newsgroups: net.ham-radio Subject: Automobile Ham call sign plates Message-ID: <8432@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Thu, 21-Feb-85 18:22:48 EST Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.8432 Posted: Thu Feb 21 18:22:48 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 26-Feb-85 20:30:34 EST Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA Lines: 34 To New Hampshire Hams: Ham call plates ARE vanity plates. They serve no purpose but to boost the ego of their owner. There is nothing wrong with that. I have call plates. They are one of my toys. I pay for my toys, but I don't want to pay for other peoples toys. Don't ask the taxpayers to subsidize your toys. If the reasons that you choose to live in New Hampshire include the fact that our government costs are so low that we have a budget surplus with no state income tax and no state sales tax, then you cannot, in good conscience, support the moves to make ham call plates "special"(==cheap==subsidized). If you want special interest groups to dictate your tax rate, you aren't likely to be happy in this state anyway. If National Guard plates serve no useful purpose either, then you thrust should be to have their special status eliminated, not to put your own hand in the til. If they do serve a purpose (I don't know that), then whether they should be given a reduced rate or should be reimbursed directly by the Guard is a separate debate. If ARRL really is supporting this foolishness, then shame on them! I urge you to write the governor and your state representatives and register your opposition, as a ham, to casting ham radio in the roll of another special interest group with its hand out. All that we should ask of out governments is the continued use of our fre- quencies. That is plenty to be grateful for already. Sincerely, Bill Freeman, KE1G